http://dx.doi.org/10.17140/OOJ-2-114
Ophthalmol Open J
Kinley D. Beck, MD
1
; Debbie Schifanella, Fellowship Program Coordinator
1
;
Kundandeep S. Nagi, MD
1
; Kent L. Anderson, MD, PhD
1
; Michael A. Singer, MD
2*
1
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX,
USA
2
Medical Center Ophthalmology Associates, San Antonio, TX, USA
*
Corresponding author
Michael A. Singer, MD
Retina Specialist at Medical Center
Ophthalmology Associates
9157 Huebner Road
San Antonio, TX 78240, USA
Tel. 210-697-2020
E-mail: Msinger1[email protected]
Article History
Received: November 26
th
, 2017
Accepted: December 6
th
, 2017
Published: December 6
th
, 2017
Citation
Beck KD, Schifanella D, Nagi KS, An-
derson KL, Singer MA. Writing thank you
notes after ophthalmology residency in-
terviews? Ophthalmol Open J. 2017;
2(2): 48-51. doi: 10.17140/OOJ-2-114
Copyright
©2017 Singer MA. This is an open
access article distributed under the
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (CC BY 4.0),
which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original
work is properly cited.
Volume 2 : Issue 2
Article Ref. #: 1000OOJ2114
Writing Thank You Notes after
Ophthalmology Residency Interviews?
Page 48
Brief Research
Report
ABSTRACT
Objective:
To determine the importance of writing thank you notes after ophthalmology resi-
dency interviews.
Design: Survey.
Participants: Ophthalmology residency faculty members.
Methods: A short multiple-choice survey using www.surveymonkey.com was distributed to As-
sociation of University Professors of Ophthalmology (AUPO) personnel who then distributed
it to their respective faculty members that are involved in interviewing and ranking applicants.
Six questions were asked to determine the importance of thank you notes after ophthalmology
residency interviews along with the option to write comments.
Main outcome measures: The impact of thank you notes in the ranking of ophthalmology ap-
plicants following interviews.
Results: Seventy ve total participants took the survey during the month of March 2016. Nine-
ty point eight percent reported thank you notes never change their ranking of applicants; 4.6%
responded yes, mostly in higher ranking; 4.6% responded yes, equally resulting in higher/
lower ranking depending on the circumstances; and 0% chose yes, mostly resulting in lower
ranking. When asked if they recommend applicants to write thank you notes: 46.7% chose no;
33.3% chose yes, only if personalized; 13.3% chose yes; and 6.7% chose yes, only if telling
the program you are ranking them #1 (and mean it). Twenty six respondents wrote comments.
Conclusions: Based on the survey responses, largely thank you notes do not impact the ranking
of ophthalmology applicants following interviews. However, many feel there is still a role for
them.
KEY WORDS: Thank you notes; Ophthalmology residency interviews.
INTRODUCTION
The current gold standard is practicing evidence-based medicine. The road to residency is a
rigorous one including 4 years of medical school, board exams, applying for residency, inter-
viewing, and hopefully ending with matching at your desired program. What can and should
one do after the interview?
Thank you notes after residency interviews remain to be recommended with only one
survey done in 2010 asking 2 questions about thank you notes after ophthalmology residency
interviews that revealed 14% of faculty members expect or desire them and only 3% are inu-
enced by an applicant stating the program is their rst choice.
1
Doing a quick Internet search,
one can nd numerous medical schools recommending thank you notes (UCSF, Drexel, Rut-
gers,and Iowa to name a few)
2-5
along with residency websites (American Academy of Family
Practitioners and Emergency Medicine Residents Association)
6,7
and sites geared towards med-
ical students.
8
THE OPHTHALMOLOGY OPEN JOURNAL
ISSN 2475-1278
Ophthalmol Open J
Page 49
METHODS
A 6 question multiple-choice survey was created using www.
surveymonkey.com. The study was granted exempt status by the
Institutional Review Board (IRB) of UT Health San Antonio.
The survey was distributed to Association of University Profes-
sors of Ophthalmology (AUPO) personnel who then distributed
it to their respective faculty members that interview and rank
applicants. The survey included the following questions: the
location of their residency program; their amount of time after
training; do they enjoy receiving thank you notes; do thank you
notes change their ranking of applicants; do they recommend
applicants write thank you notes; and, if so, in what format. They
were also allowed to write comments (See Supplementary Data).
RESULTS
Seventy ve total people took the survey during the month of
March 2016. Their location breakdown was the following: 35%
Midwest, 35% Northeast, 9.5% West, 9.5% Southwest, 9.5%
Southeast, and 1% anonymous. Fourty point three percent are
faculty members for greater than 10 years, 29.2% faculty mem-
bers less than 5 years, 19.4% residency directors, 8.33% facul-
ty members for 5-10 years, and 2.8% chairmen. Twenty eight
percent responded that they are indierent to receiving thank
you notes, 25.3% always enjoy receiving them, 25.3% enjoy
them only if personalized, and 21% do not enjoy receiving
them. Ninety point eight percent reported thank you notes never
change their ranking of applicants (Figure 1); 4.6% responded
yes, mostly in higher ranking; 4.6% responded yes, equally re-
sulting in higher/lower ranking depending on the circumstanc-
es; and 0% chose yes, mostly resulting in lower ranking. When
asked if they recommend applicants to write thank you notes:
46.7% chose no; 33.3% chose yes, only if personalized; 13.3%
chose yes; and 6.7% chose yes, only if telling the program you
are ranking them #1 (and mean it). Thirty seven percent do
not have a preference between emailing thank you note versus
hand-written, 21.9% prefer hand-written letters, 4.11% prefer
email, and 37% responded non-applicable because do not rec-
ommend thank you notes. Twenty six respondents wrote com-
ments at the end of the survey (Figure 2).
Figure 1: Do Thank You Notes Change the Ranking of Ophthalmology Applicants?
Figure 2A and 2B: Comments Provided by Survey Responders.
A B
THE OPHTHALMOLOGY OPEN JOURNAL
http://dx.doi.org/10.17140/OOJ-2-114
ISSN 2475-1278
Ophthalmol Open J
Page 50
DISCUSSION
Based on the comments, faculty members remain divided on the
viewpoint of writing thank you notes after ophthalmology resi-
dency interviews. By in large, thank you notes do not appear to
impact the ranking of ophthalmology applicants following in-
terviews and are not seen as a requirement. They do, however,
remain an option for an applicant to show their genuine interest
in a program and an opportunity for a program to receive further
insight into an applicant’s personality.
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
None except Michael A. Singer (see below).
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Conicts of interest only for Michael A. Singer: Allergan, Alle-
gro, Ampio, Genentech, Ophthotech, Regeneron, Santen, Aer-
pio, Optos, Alcon, Clearside, Notal Vision, Guidepoint, Alimera.
In accordance with Openventio Publishers policy and
my ethical obligation as a researcher, I am reporting that Dr.
Singer is a consultant for the following companies: Allergan,
Genentech, Regeneron, Santen, Clearside, Aerpio, and Alime-
ra. Dr. Singer is a Speakers Bureau for the following: Allergan,
Genentech, and Regeneron. Dr. Singer is involved in research
support with the following: Allergan, Genentech, Regeneron,
Ampio, Optos, Aerpio, Allegro, and Diachii, and Clearside.
These aliations did not aect research reported in the enclosed
paper. I have disclosed those interests fully to Openventio Pub-
lishers.
REFERENCES
1. Nallasamy S, Uhler T, Nallasamy N, et al. Ophthalmology
resident selection: Current trends in selection criteria and impro-
ving the process. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117(5): 1041-1047. doi:
10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.07.034
2. UCSF Career. The Thank You Note, Dissected. https://career.
ucsf.edu/sites/career.ucsf.edu/les/PDF/pharmacythankyoulet-
ter1.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2017.
3. Drexel University College of Medicine. Resources for Inter-
view Preparation and Practice. https://webcampus.drexelmed.
edu/cdc/medInterviewGuide.asp. Accessed August 29, 2017.
4. Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School. The Inter-
view, Advice from Peers. http://rwjms.rutgers.edu/education/
current_students/student_support/career_res/documents/TheIn-
terview.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2017.
5. University of Iowa Health Care. Interviews: University of
Iowa, Ophthalmology. http://webeye.ophth.uiowa.edu/eyefo-
rum/tutorials/iowa-guide-to-the-ophthalmology-match/9-inter-
views-partB.htm. Accessed August 29, 2017.
6. Academy of Family Practioners. Interviewing for Family Me-
dicine Residency. http://www.aafp.org/medical-school-residen-
cy/residency/interviews/after.html. Accessed August 29, 2017.
7. Kraus C. The Interview. EMRA.org. https://www.emra.org/
students/advising/_to_sort/the_interview/. Updated January,
2009. Accessed August 29, 2017.
8. Usmle WEB. Thank You Letter. http://www.usmleweb.com/
sample_thank_you_letter.html. Accessed August 29, 2017.
THE OPHTHALMOLOGY OPEN JOURNAL
http://dx.doi.org/10.17140/OOJ-2-114
ISSN 2475-1278
Ophthalmol Open J
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Survey Questions
- Background Questions of Survey Responder:
1. Location of residency program: will provide a map of the United States so they can choose region of the United States (northeast,
west, Midwest, southeast, southwest). There will also an anonymous option if they would rather not disclose location.
2. Number of years after training of the survey responder or Title (only can choose one option):
Chairman
Residency Director
Faculty member for <5 years
Faculty member for 5-10 years
Faculty member for >10 years
- Specic Thank You Note Questions:
1. Do you enjoy receiving thank you notes:
No
Yes, always
Only if personalized
Indierent
2. Do thank you notes change your ranking of applicants:
Never
Yes (if choose yes then will be given other options as below and a comment box at the end)
Mostly only results in lower ranking (poorly written etc…)
Mostly only results in raising ranking
Equally results in raising or lowering ranking
3. Would you recommend applicants write thank you notes:
Yes
No
Yes. Only recommend writing one to tell your #1 program that you are ranking them #1
Yes, only if personalized
4. If said yes to #3, which format would you recommend?
Email
Hand-written on paper
Either is ne
N/A (not recommend)
Comment section at the end of the survey
Page 51
THE OPHTHALMOLOGY OPEN JOURNAL
http://dx.doi.org/10.17140/OOJ-2-114
ISSN 2475-1278