House Research Department December 2006
Endocrine Disrupters as Emerging Contaminants in Wastewater Page 4
Possible Future Initiatives
Initiatives to prevent contamination by endocrine disrupters can range from aggressive public
education efforts to more costly regulation and enforcement. Many regulations on hazardous
wastes and wastewater treatment systems have not been updated since the late 1970s, nor kept
pace with the growing number of chemical compounds in the marketplace that should be
watched for regulation. Health care providers often become confused about which
pharmaceuticals may be hazardous or not, and how they should be disposed.
A strong public education program may be a way to alleviate concern over hazardous
pharmaceuticals and also can be a tool to reduce the amount of medications that are flushed into
the sewer system. Recommendations have included a labeling program like ones used to educate
consumers about household pesticides. Some experts say the best approach is to remove toxic
chemicals at the source rather than after disposal; take-back programs by the manufacturers of
unused products would be a cost-effective solution.
Communities could add pharmaceuticals to their household hazardous waste collection
programs, where consumers drop off the materials at designated sites once or twice a year.
On the federal level, consumer and environmental organizations could encourage federal
regulatory agencies to consider water quality impacts of toxic drugs as a regular component of
their decision-making authority. State agencies could establish a more formal communication
and recommendation process for pharmaceuticals between their hazardous waste and municipal
wastewater managers. They also could discourage public wastewater treatment plants from
approving any sewering of pharmaceutical hazardous wastes that are known to be toxic.
Further Information
For more information about endocrine disruptors, see the following resources:
Tom Arrandale, “Prozac in the Water,” Governing Magazine 19: 12 (September
2006): 56-58.
Gay Daly, “Hundreds of Man-Made Chemicals,” OnEarth 27: 4 (Winter 2006): 20-
27.
David Ewing Duncan, “The Pollution Within: Our Toxic Homes,” National
Geographic 210: 4 (October 2006): 116-135.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, “Healthcare, Hazardous Waste, and
Wastewater,” slide presentation (September 2006).
Elizabeth Royte, “Drugging the Waters,” OnEarth 28: 3 (Fall 2006): 26-31.
For more information about environmental protection, visit the environment and natural
resources area of our web site, www.house.mn/hrd/issinfo/environ.htm.