But there is also the impact of professional practice and attitudes and the priorities of
care settings which can treat older people as a bed that needs to be emptied rather
than a person to be cared for. The new government must acknowledge and address
that the outcomes of poor care are not only clinical but can create fundamental
challenges to an older person’s intrinsic dignity and wellbeing.
The CQC report published on 6 July reveals more concerns on the quality of care.
Within the context of safety, the report found that levels of inadequate care have risen,
with 25% of services not being considered good enough. Safety concerns can leave
older people vulnerable to not receiving their prescribed medicine or their home visits
being missed.
Caroline Abrahams, Charity Director of Age UK, described this apparent inequality as a
‘Russian roulette’ with older people risking their own safety when finding a care
provider.
Safeguarding – further information
Stories of abuse and neglect within both residential and nursing homes are far too
common. The increased use of covert monitoring systems has provided shocking
evidence of deliberate cruelty, incompetence and criminal activity. Like all cases of
abuse and neglect every incident of abuse and neglect causes real harm not just to
victims, but also to our wider society, affecting families, friends and overall trust in the
care sector.
The issue of substandard care and abuse in residential adult services has been well
documented for many years, although a lack of research means that the real reasons
for it are not fully understood. However recent research points to common issues which
require particular focus from commissioners, regulators and providers.
The wider culture.
The specific care environment.
The relationship between carer and the person being cared for.
Effective leadership is key to enabling good outcomes in all of these areas, creating
ethical practice principles and a positive working ethos. Care services, particularly those
for older adults living with dementia, also need to have effective training and
supervision in place for all staff. Supervision should support the development of
reflective practice and strategies to cope with what can be a demanding and
emotionally heightened working environment. Service users should also have an
opportunity to feed into training and recruitment wherever possible.
Care Quality Commission Regulation 18 (Staffing) states that staff should receive
appropriate on-going or periodic supervision in their role to make sure competence is
maintained. This should go further, by specifying minimum periods between supervision
and guidance on content. Safeguarding discussions should be a regular element of
supervision with the opportunity to reflect upon the care and support that they deliver to
prevent the development of poor practice and encourage positive ways of working.
The introduction in 2015 of the Care Certificate for health and adult social care staff is
welcome. The competencies it sets out are valuable, and compliance will be assessed
by the CQC (although the Care Certificate is not mandatory). It remains a concern that
it does not provide a full solution for ensuring workforce suitability and competence. The
risk of low quality and inconsistent e-learning and classroom based training remains. A
range of training providers are operating in this field, with some misleadingly claiming to