10
Chapter 7
Our Approach to Competition and
Wholesale Data Market Study
7.1 As Article 8d aims to promote competition in the CRA market, we take this opportunity
to refer to our competition objective. We have a range of tools we can use to protect
and promote competition. These include powers to undertake market studies and make
market investigation references to the Competition Markets Authority, as well as to
enforce the prohibitions in the Competition Act 1998 on anticompetitive agreements
and concerted practices, and on abuse of a dominant position.
7.2 On 2March 2023, we launched a market study following persistent user concerns
about how well wholesale data markets are working. One of the key areas of focus is on
competition in the provision of credit ratings data. On 31 August 2023, we published an
update report on the market study.
7.3 Based on our work to date, we propose not to refer any of the markets in scope of
the study to the CMA at this stage. While we believe there are reasonable grounds to
suspect there are features of each of the relevant markets that prevent, restrict, or
distort competition in the UK, our provisional view is that it is most appropriate for us
to take forward further work to identify and address potential harm caused by these
features ourselves.
7.4 In the remainder of the market study, we plan to extend and develop our analysis of
the information we have collected. Our market study report will include our findings on
competition in these markets and our decision whether to make an MIR, an explanation
of our decision and other actions to address the issues identified. We will publish this
report by 1March 2024.
7.5 Credit ratings are overwhelmingly paid for by debt-issuing firms, with the resulting
ratings given to CRAs’ data affiliates to license and distribute as part of data services.
The credit ratings data market is highly concentrated among data affiliates of the 3
largest CRAs: Moody’s Analytics, S&P Global Market Intelligence and Fitch Solutions.
Our analysis indicates that, among credit ratings data originators, data affiliates of the 3
largest CRAs account for a large majority of revenues from UK-domiciled end users.
7.6 As outlined in the update report on the market study, in response to our survey, data
users highlighted a perceived lack of transparency around how prices were set for credit
ratings data. Some users suggested they were paying significantly different prices to their
peers. Fees schedules are not typically publicly available. Data users were unclear about
pricing factors, and their respective weightings on end prices. Many larger firms said
regulatory and end investor requirements meant they had to license credit ratings data
from all of the 3 largest CRA’s data affiliates, with ratings from smaller CRAs not viewed
as a viable alternative. This limits many users’ choice of credit ratings data services.
This situation may allow CRA data affiliates to price discriminate in ways which can limit
competition, such as charging higher prices to firms who cannot switch service providers.