DP012 How to determine the legal grounds for processing employee data under the General Data
Protection Regulation (GDPR) manager's guide
How to determine the legal grounds for
processing employee data under the
General Data Protection Regulation
(GDPR) manager's guide
Page | 2
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 3
THE LEGAL GROUNDS FOR PROCESSING ......................................................................... 4
SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF PERSONAL DATA AND CRIMINAL RECORDS DATA..................... 8
DETERMINING THE GROUND(S) FOR PROCESSING ......................................................... 10
Page | 3
INTRODUCTION
The General Data Protection Regulation will apply from 25
th
May 2018, and employers will
need to comply with the GDPR data protection principles when they are processing
employees' personal data. For data processing to be lawful, one or more of six legal bases
for processing set out in the GDPR must apply.
The employer will need to identify the legal basis for processing in advance to ensure that it
is complying with the lawful processing principle and is able to demonstrate its compliance.
It will be impossible for the employer to understand the extent of an employee's data
subject rights or to draft a compliant privacy notice without first identifying the legal basis
for processing.
Page | 4
THE LEGAL GROUNDS FOR PROCESSING
There are six grounds for processing personal data under the GDPR. These are that:
the data subject has consented to processing for one or more specific purposes;
processing is necessary for the performance of a contract to which the data subject
is party, or in order to take steps at the data subject's request prior to entering into
a contract;
processing is necessary to comply with a legal obligation of the data controller;
processing is necessary to protect the data subject's vital interests or those of
another person;
processing is necessary for the performance of a task carried out in the public
interest; and
processing is necessary for the purposes of the data controller's legitimate interests
(or those of a third party), unless those interests are overridden by the interests or
fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject.
Consent is unlikely to provide a suitable legal basis for processing most types of employee
data.
The three legal bases most relevant in the employment context are performance of a
contract, compliance with a legal obligation and legitimate interests of the employer.
Consent
Many employers have relied on consent as a basis for processing employee data. Employers
have commonly included data protection consent clauses in employment contracts.
The GDPR makes it clear that consent to processing will be valid only if:
it is freely given, informed, specific and unambiguous;
it is obtained by a clear affirmative action;
where it is obtained in a document containing other matters, it is clearly
distinguishable from the other matters, is in an intelligible and easily accessible
form, and uses clear and plain language; and
the employee has the right to withdraw consent to processing at any time, and
withdrawing consent is as easy as giving consent in the first place.
Page | 5
The recitals to the GDPR make it clear that consent will not be a valid legal basis for
processing if there is a clear imbalance of power between a data subject and the data
controller. Consent in those circumstances is unlikely to be freely given. The Information
Commissioner's guidance confirms that employment relationships usually involve such an
imbalance of power, and that employers should avoid relying on consent as a legal basis for
processing employee data.
From a practical point of view, it is inadvisable for an employer to rely on consent as a legal
basis for processing, as the employee could withdraw his or her consent at any time.
Performance of a contract
Employers will have to process some employee data to perform their obligations to the
individual under the contract of employment. For example, to pay employees, employers
have to process personal data such as names, working hours and bank account details.
Employers are likely to rely on the performance of a contract as the legal basis for
processing in that context. This will also be the legal basis for processing data in relation to
employees' contractual benefits, for example recording details of absences to ensure that
employees receive their entitlement to occupational sick pay.
Compliance with legal obligations
Employers have a range of legal obligations relating to employees. For example, if an
employee goes on maternity leave, she has a right to return to work and may be entitled to
statutory maternity pay (SMP). Her employer will need to process information about her pay
and about the dates on which she starts and finishes maternity leave to make sure it is
paying her the SMP to which she is entitled and allowing her to return to work at the
appropriate time.
Employers are likely to rely on complying with a legal obligation as the legal basis for
processing data in that context. This may also be the case in relation to keeping records of
disciplinary and grievance proceedings; processing data in those circumstances is necessary
to enable the employer to comply with, for example, the obligation not to dismiss an
employee unfairly. Similarly, employers will have to keep records of employees' hours to
ensure compliance with the rules on maximum working hours and the national minimum
wage.
Page | 6
The employer's legitimate interests
Employers will have to rely on legitimate interests as the legal basis for processing data in
any situation where it is necessary to process data but not in connection with the
performance of a contract or compliance with a legal obligation.
For example, employers may want to record when employees enter and leave the workplace
for security reasons. If the records allow individual employees' entry and exit times to be
identified, this will constitute their personal data. The employer does not need to keep this
information to perform its obligations under the employment contract or to comply with a
legal obligation. It will have to rely on the processing being necessary for its legitimate
interests in maintaining security as the legal basis for processing.
A further example of where an employer could rely on its legitimate interests as the legal
basis for processing is where it retains personal data about unsuccessful job applicants for a
period in case an applicant makes a complaint about the recruitment process. In this case, it
is necessary for the employer to process data for its legitimate interests in defending a
potential legal claim.
The employer's legitimate interests would also provide a legal basis for processing personal
data in relation to appraisals; this would be necessary for the employers' interests in
maintaining performance standards.
Problems with using legitimate interests as a legal basis
One drawback to relying on legitimate interests as the basis for processing is that it involves
balancing the interests of the employer with those of the employee. If the employee's
interests or rights and freedoms outweigh those of the employer, the employer will not be
able to rely on its legitimate interests as the legal basis for processing. The more sensitive or
intrusive the processing, the more difficult it will be to show that the legitimate interests
basis applies. The employer should weigh the importance of the processing against the
possible adverse impact on employees, and assess whether or not there is an alternative,
less intrusive, way to achieve its objectives. This will help it to demonstrate that it is
appropriate to use its legitimate interests as the basis for processing.
Employees have more extensive rights if the employer is relying on legitimate interests as
the basis for processing. The employer must tell the employees, in a privacy notice, what
legitimate interests it is pursuing. Employees have a right to object to processing based on
legitimate interests. If an employee objects, the employer must show that there are
Page | 7
compelling legitimate grounds for processing the data that override the employee's interests
or rights and freedoms. The employee can require the employer to restrict data processing
(i.e. stop the processing) until it shows that its legitimate interests outweigh those of the
employee. The employee can also require the employer to erase his or her personal data if
there are no overriding legitimate grounds for processing it.
Page | 8
SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF PERSONAL DATA
AND CRIMINAL RECORDS DATA
Special rules apply if an employer is processing "special categories" of data (this is broadly
the same as sensitive personal data under the Data Protection Act 1998). The special
categories of data are data that relates to an employee's racial or ethnic origin, political
opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade union membership, health, sex life or
sexual orientation and biometric data.
If an employer processes special categories of data, it has to show that one of the specific
legal grounds for processing such data applies. The grounds for processing special
categories of data under the GDPR that are most likely to be relevant in the employment
context are that:
processing is necessary for carrying out obligations and exercising rights in the field
of employment law, as authorised by national law;
processing is necessary for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims;
and
the employee has given explicit consent to processing for specified purposes.
Personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences is not included in the "special
categories" of data, but is subject to similar additional protection.
The Data Protection Bill will allow an employer to process special categories of data and
criminal records data where the processing is necessary for performing obligations or
exercising rights under employment law, provided that the employer has an appropriate
policy document in place.
To be an appropriate policy document under the Data Protection Bill, the document must
explain:
how the employer complies with the GDPR data protection principles in relation to
the processing of special categories of data and criminal records data; and
the employer's policies in connection with the retention and erasure of special
categories of data and criminal records data, including an indication of for how long
such data will be kept.
The employer must retain, review and update the document from time to time, and make it
available to the Information Commissioner on request.
Page | 9
Similar issues arise in relation to relying on consent for processing special categories of data
as in relation to other personal data. An employer can rely on employees' consent only if
there would be no adverse effects should they choose not to give it or to withdraw it. For
example, if an employer runs a voluntary fitness programme for employees as part of a
wellbeing strategy, it could ask employees for their consent to process health data that is
gathered under the programme. Provided that the programme is entirely voluntary, and
there are no negative consequences for employees if they refuse to consent, the employer
could rely on consent for processing the data.
The Data Protection Bill includes a limited provision that allows data relating to racial or
ethnic origin, religious or philosophical beliefs, health or sexual orientation to be processed
for equal opportunities monitoring purposes. This is strictly limited to the types of data
mentioned and is subject to certain other limitations, including that the employee can
require the employer to stop processing his or her data. The employer can rely on this
condition for processing only if it has an appropriate policy document in place.
Page | 10
DETERMINING THE GROUND(S) FOR PROCESSING
A key part of an employer's GDPR compliance programme will be to conduct an HR personal
data audit. The audit process involves the employer identifying the HR personal data that
the organisation processes and gathering relevant information about each category.
The employer should use the information gathered during the data audit to determine the
legal grounds for processing each category of employee personal data. This can be done
either as part of the audit process, or as a separate exercise. Essentially the employer
should ask itself a series of questions about its reasons for processing data, which will help it
decide which legal basis is appropriate in each case.
What is the purpose of the processing? The first question for the employer to ask is
why it processes each type of personal data. The employer should record that information
as part of the data audit. There may be more than one purpose for processing a particular
set of data and the employer should record all relevant purposes. Employers should note
that the purpose of processing is different to the legal basis for processing. For example, the
purpose of processing data relating to employees' annual leave would include tracking their
holiday entitlement and planning absence cover. The employer should go on to identify the
legal grounds for processing for each purpose.
Is it necessary for performance of the contract? Once it has recorded the purpose or
purposes for processing, in relation to each purpose the employer should ask itself if the
processing is necessary for performance of the employment contract. That is likely to be the
case where the employer processes relevant data to ensure that an employee receives the
pay or other contractual benefits to which he or she is entitled.
Is it necessary for compliance with a legal obligation? The next question is whether
or not processing is necessary to enable the employer to comply with its employment law
obligations. This is likely to be the case, for example, where it processes data in connection
with entitlements to family-related leave and pay.
Is it necessary for the employer's legitimate interests? If the employer cannot rely
on the performance of the employment contract or compliance with a legal obligation as a
condition for processing, it should consider if the processing is necessary for its legitimate
interests. If it is, it should identify and record what those legitimate interests are, consider
whether or not its own interests outweigh the rights and freedoms of employees, and record
the outcome (using a formal or informal impact assessment as appropriate). The employer
may conclude that the impact of the processing on employees outweighs its own legitimate
Page | 11
interests; for example, it could decide that employee monitoring is disproportionately
intrusive. Where it reaches such a conclusion, the employer should either stop processing
the relevant category of data, or process the data in a way that reduces the impact on
employees.
If the processing is not necessary for the performance of a contract or compliance with a
legal obligation and the employer is unable to identify a legitimate interest that provides a
basis for processing the data, it should stop processing it, except in the limited
circumstances in which it may be appropriate to seek the employee's consent.
Recording different grounds for processing
The employer may process the same data for more than one purpose. For example,
information about family-related leave is processed to ensure that employees receive their
legal entitlements. However, it may also be processed for diversity monitoring reasons, to
allow the employer to assess its record on retaining and promoting employees who have
taken a period of leave. Processing the data for that reason will be in the employer's
legitimate interests and the impact on employees is likely to be low.
Another example of where there is more than one basis for processing is the processing of
data relating to disciplinary, grievance or performance issues. This will be necessary to
enable the employer to comply with its employment law obligations, but is also necessary to
enable it to meet its legitimate interests in maintaining appropriate standards of behaviour
and performance within the organisation. Those needs will generally outweigh the rights and
freedoms of employees.
If there is more than one basis for processing data, the employer should identify and record
all of the relevant legal bases, to ensure that relevant data subject rights are observed. As
noted above, an individual has greater rights in relation to data processed for legitimate
interests than in relation to data processed for other reasons. Therefore, it is important for
employers to record all the reasons why they process a particular type of data at the outset.
Where an employer is processing special categories of personal data or criminal records
data, it needs to carry out a similar exercise to identify the legal basis for processing and
ensure that one of the relevant conditions for processing applies. This is likely to be
particularly relevant to health data, which the employer may need to process to establish an
employee's fitness to work and to comply with its obligations to employees with disabilities;
to special categories of data processed for equal opportunities monitoring; and to
information about an employee's criminal record processed as part of a recruitment process.
Page | 12
As noted above, the employer will need to put in place an appropriate policy on special
categories of data and criminal records data.
Next steps
Once the employer has identified the legal basis for processing each category of data, it
needs to ensure that this information is included in the privacy notices it provides to job
applicants and to employees. If the employer is relying on its legitimate interests as the
legal basis for processing, it must identify those interests in the privacy notice.
The GDPR imposes an obligation on organisations to maintain a "record of processing
activities", also known as a data register, which must be made available to the regulator
(the Information Commissioner in the UK) on request. The register must include information
about the purposes of processing. It is advisable for employers also to include the grounds
for processing as this will help them to demonstrate that they are complying with the
principle of accountability under the GDPR.
Employees may have additional rights associated with certain bases for processing their
data. Employers should put processes in place to ensure that they respond appropriately if
an employee seeks to exercise those rights, in particular by objecting to processing or
asking the employer to delete his or her data.
In the event that an employee objects to processing, the employer should be able to refer
back to its assessment of whether or not its legitimate interests outweigh the rights and
freedoms of employees. This will allow it to defeat the right to object. Procedures should
also be in place to restrict processing of relevant data until the employer's reasons for
processing data are verified.
Where an employee requests to have his or her data deleted, the employer should check
that the right applies and if there is any other legal basis for continuing to process the data.
It can then delete or retain relevant data as required.