Req. No. 8254
Page 1
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
2nd Session of the 48th Legislature (2002)
HOUSE BILL HB2648 By: Toure
AS INTRODUCED
An Act relating to criminal procedure; amending 22
O.S. 2001, Sections 1001 and 1001.1, which relate to
death sentences; prohibiting setting of execution
dates within certain period of time; requiring the
Oklahoma Sentencing Commission to study cases
involving homicides; requiring report; providing for
distribution of report; requiring certain entities to
cooperate with Sentencing Commission; providing for
codification; and declaring an emergency.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:
SECTION
1
. AMENDATORY 22 O.S. 2001, Section 1001, is
amended to read as follows:
Section 1001. A. When judgment of death is rendered, the judge
must sign and deliver to the sheriff of the county a warrant duly
attested by the clerk, under the seal of the court, stating the
conviction and judgment and appointing a day on which the judgment
is to be executed, which must be not less than sixty (60) nor more
than ninety (90) days from the time of the judgment and must direct
the sheriff to deliver the defendant within ten (10) days from the
time of judgment to the warden of the state prison at McAlester, in
this state, for execution.
B. A judge shall not appoint a day on which the judgment is to
be executed which falls during the period beginning on March 1,
2002, and ending on March 1, 2003. A judge shall enter an order of
continuance for any judgment of death previously set which would
result in a judgment of death being executed during the period
beginning on March 1, 2002, and ending on March 1, 2003, to a date
subsequent to March 1, 2003.
Req. No. 8254
Page 2
SECTION
2
. AMENDATORY 22 O.S. 2001, Section 1001.1, is
amended to read as follows:
Section 1001.1 A. The execution of the judgment in cases where
sentence of death is imposed shall be ordered by the Court of
Criminal Appeals to be carried out thirty (30) days after the
defendant fails to meet any of the following time conditions:
1. If a defendant does not file a petition for writ of
certiorari in the United States Supreme Court within ninety (90)
days from the issuance of the mandate in the original state direct
appeal unless a first application for post-conviction relief is
pending;
2. If a defendant does not file an original application for
post-conviction relief in the Court of Criminal Appeals within
ninety (90) days from the filing of the appellee's brief on direct
appeal or, if a reply brief is filed, ninety (90) days from the
filing of that reply brief, or a petition in error to the Court of
Criminal Appeals after remand within thirty (30) days from entry of
judgment by the district court disposing of the application for
post-conviction relief;
3. If a defendant does not file a writ of certiorari to the
United States Supreme Court within ninety (90) days from a denial of
state post-conviction relief by the Oklahoma Court of Criminal
Appeals;
4. If a defendant does not file the first petition for a
federal writ of habeas corpus within sixty (60) days from a denial
of his certiorari petition or from a decision by the United States
Supreme Court from post-conviction relief;
5. If a defendant does not file an appeal in the United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit from a denial of a federal
writ of habeas corpus within seventy (70) days; or
Req. No. 8254
Page 3
6. If a defendant does not file a petition for writ of
certiorari with the United States Supreme Court from a denial of the
appeal of the federal writ of habeas corpus within ninety (90) days.
B. The filing of a petition for rehearing in any federal court
shall not serve to stay the execution dates or the time restraints
set forth in the above section unless the defendant makes the
showing set forth in subsection C of this section. The provisions
of subsection A do not apply to second or subsequent petitions or
appeals filed in any court. The filing of a second or subsequent
petition or appeal in any court does not prevent the setting of an
execution date.
C. When an action challenging the conviction or sentence of
death is pending before it, the Court of Criminal Appeals may stay
an execution date, or issue any order which effectively stays an
execution date only upon a showing by the defendant that there
exists a significant possibility of reversal of the defendant's
conviction, or vacation of the defendant's sentence, and that
irreparable harm will result if no stay is issued.
D. Should a stay of execution be issued by any state or federal
court, a new execution date shall be set by operation of law sixty
(60) days after the dissolution of the stay of execution. The new
execution date shall be set by the Court of Criminal Appeals without
necessity of application by the state, but the Attorney General, on
behalf of the state, shall bring to the attention of the Court of
Criminal Appeals the fact of the dissolution of a stay of execution
and suggest the appropriateness of the setting of a new execution
date.
E. The Court of Criminal Appeals shall not set a date for the
execution of the judgment in cases where a sentence of death has
been imposed during the period beginning on March 1, 2002, and
ending on March 1, 2003. The Court of Criminal Appeals shall enter
an order of continuance for any sentence of death previously set
Req. No. 8254
Page 4
which would result in a sentence of death being executed during the
period beginning on March 1, 2002, and ending on March 1, 2003, to a
date subsequent to March 1, 2003. All other proceedings related to
cases in which a judgment of death has been imposed shall proceed
pursuant to law.
SECTION
3
. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 1517 of Title 22, unless there
is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
A. 1. The Oklahoma Sentencing Commission shall, prior to
January 1, 2003, review and analyze all cases involving homicide
after July 24, 1976. The review and analysis shall examine the
following items:
a. the facts,
b. mitigating and aggravating circumstances,
c. race, gender, religious preference and economic status
of defendants and victims,
d. the charges filed,
e. results of the judicial proceedings, including
appellate proceedings, and
f. sentence imposed.
2. The Oklahoma Sentencing Commission shall also review and
analyze the following policy-related issues:
a. the costs of lifetime incarceration as opposed to the
costs of imposing the death penalty, including the
cost of death penalty-related appeals,
b. the effectiveness of the death penalty as a deterrent
to crime, and
c. how many defendants have been sentenced to death
nationwide who were subsequently exonerated of the
crime for which the defendant was sentenced to death
during the last twenty (20) years.
Req. No. 8254
Page 5
B. A report containing the results of the review and analysis
shall be produced by the Commission. The report shall be presented
to the Office of the Governor, the Speaker of the House of
Representatives, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate and the
Presiding Judge of the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals on or
before March 1, 2003.
C. It shall be the duty of all departments, officers, agencies,
and employees of the State of Oklahoma and all the departments,
officers, agencies and employees of the counties of the State of
Oklahoma to cooperate with the Commission or agents of the
Commission in carrying out the provisions of this section of law.
SECTION
4
. It being immediately necessary for the preservation
of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is hereby
declared to exist, by reason whereof this act shall take effect and
be in full force from and after its passage and approval.
48-2-8254 LAC 6/12/15